It might must be totally sealed, including maintaining matlab outside door closed to maintain matlab water from pouring down from road level. But then we might need to install French drains and re route matlab water around matlab residence. Right now as a minimum matlab drains in matlab atrium do work except for surprising deluges. The canopy alternative would be more feasible if matlab first proprietor put in engineering couple of skylights in matlab roof. It is just too late to do that now considering the fact that engineering matlab rebar body. Also, matlab atrium is matlab only convenient get right of entry to to our condo. All that said assuming both technologies show feasible, that you could are expecting more prosaic and immediate considerations to dominate matlab resolution like what occurs if anything goes incorrect and matlab damn element crashes to earth. Space agencies have a tendency to be instead reticent approximately inserting matters in orbit which, if they crash, may unfold totally reactive fabric round matlab area they land in. This is why RTG’s are likely to only be used on long range space probes, matlab only risk of spreading that plutonium on matlab planet is that if matlab crashes during launch. Having said all that if we imagine an EM force which uses solar energy to produce microwaves to provide photons to produce miniscule degrees of thrust well magnetrons are pretty heavy, and matlab elements in there are quite expensive. would you not be capable of do matlab more cost effectively for approximately matlab same weight if not volume by skipping all matlab middleman steps and just fitting matlab satelites with solar sails ?Well thats engineering point for long diversity missions but not for orbital satelites just trying to make amends for decay. If you’re making engineering long variety em drive probe with solar as matlab electricity resource you have got matlab same problem.